In the following article, we understand that our freedom to inform you without risk of censorship may be harmed....indeed the big lobbies always test new concepts in Anglo-Saxon countries to see the reaction of people to a new liberticide law.

Here is some news from a far away country but this might be only the first step...

New South Wales (NSW), Australia: The Health Care Complaints Committee has convened an inquiry into "The promotion of false or misleading health-related information or practices. "The Terms of Reference (ToR) for this survey are sobering, and read more like a wish list from the pharmaceutical industry than legislation that could benefit Australian citizens.

The Committee, which is responsible for the NSW Health Care Complaints Commission (HCCC), defines information that is not "accepted" as standard medical practice as "false and misleading" and seeks to punish and silence all those who either publicly discuss, use or prescribe non-traditional remedies.

This investigation appears to have been prompted by WCHE's loss of its anti-vaccination lawsuit (AVN) to the Supreme Court in 2012. The WCHE sought to sanction the AVN for providing "dangerous, misleading and deceptive" information, simply because the information was in contravention of "accepted medical practices. "The Supreme Court ruled that the WCHE acted illegally at the investigative level".

Since this embarrassing loss in its lawsuit against a small group of penniless parents", the CMES has sought increased powers from Parliament specifically for the purpose of attacking the AVN and other individuals and/or organizations critical of current government health policy.

The real purpose of the WCHE

These actions are extremely ironic since the original purpose of the WCHE is to protect the public from health practitioners deemed to be dangerous. Today, it seems to an informed observer that the real purpose of this body is to protect practitioners and dangerous practices from the general public.

This sordid recent history of the WCHE shows its inability to act in the case of Graeme Reeves, known as the Butcher of Bega. Reeves has been accused of mutilating and abusing more than 500 women, many of whom have filed complaints against him with the WCHE. For more than a decade, they failed or refused to act on these complaints.

The CMES above the law?

Before the loss of the WCHE case, this organization was already one of the most powerful in Australia, being immune to subpoenas or GIPA (freedom of information).

In 2013, however, the CMES gained the right to file complaints against organizations or individuals - without any evidence of harm - and then to investigate and punish those who had filed complaints, thus becoming judge, jury and executioner.

If the Australian Parliament grants the HCCC the powers being discussed by this inquiry, then they will be able to prevent anyone from discussing, practicing or using natural therapies.

Speak out and help us protect the rights to health and freedom of information!

This is an unprecedented attack on health rights that must be vigorously opposed if you live in Australia or elsewhere.

Reproduced with permission from the site www.naturalnews.com